Again, I have re-read this thread. I found no references to Brian using the term fanatic. Perhaps somewhere else in another post? Either way, it doesn't make it right.
Anonymous,
It may not be obvious to you but this conversation began months ago. Brian has used the term fanatic repeatedly to dismiss any one who questioned the accuracy of his nuclear claims. This is one of his many ways of discounting and offhandedly dismissing opposing viewpoints. During this particular thread, it occured to me that Brian has been projecting his own clearly demonstrated fanaticism on all who would dare question his self delusional authority. This is my observation after several months of reading his lectures. He has a long history of vitrolic wordspeak and is now eating his just desserts.
Brian has continually cited sources of information that have zero validity. He has dodged this particular criticism by ignoring it. You have entered a long standing discourse and have drawn convenient conclusions which clearly suit your bias. I don't need to know you to draw this conclusion, you see, your words speak for themselves and thus, your ascertations about being open do not hold any water with me.
During the course of our conversation, Phalarope has demonstrated a biting wit and other worldly wisdom. At this point he has seen enough to offer some insight into Brian's inability to broaden his perspective.
You are new to this particular game, or so it seems. It appears as though you have jumped the gun, a false start so to speak. Perhaps, your thinking is not lazy; it may be that you are a tad overeager to aid the apparent underdog.
Posted by: Spaz Zapper | September 6, 2007 02:29 PM
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment